Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303216›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2025

Patient and Provider Attitudes Toward Patient-Facing Kidney Organ Offer Reporting.

Syed Ali Husain, Jordan A Rubenstein, Seshma Ramsawak, Anne M Huml, Miko E Yu, Lindsey M Maclay, Jesse D Schold, Sumit Mohan

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Syed Ali HusainDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jordan A RubensteinDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Seshma RamsawakDepartment of Kidney Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Anne M HumlDepartment of Kidney Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Miko E YuDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Lindsey M MaclayDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jesse D ScholdDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Sumit MohanDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

Using Decision Making Science to Optimize Deceased Donor Kidney AllocationK23DK133729 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HUSAIN, SYED ALI · 2022 to 2025
$678k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK133729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In the United States (US), deceased donor kidney offers are most commonly declined by transplant centers on behalf of waitlisted candidates, without notifying them. We sought to understand patient and provider attitudes toward patient-facing organ offer reporting. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of patients, nephrologists, and nephrology social workers on the National Kidney Foundation mailing list and the medical and surgical directors of US kidney transplant programs. Results: Among 755 patient respondents, 64% wanted to receive organ offer reports. Patients who wanted organ offer information were younger, more likely to be of a non-White race, and more likely to be on dialysis or on the waiting list. Of the patients, 87% reported that centers should be required to tell candidates about the offers they receive, and 62% reported that candidates should be informed after every offer. Among the 107 nephrology respondents, 73% reported that candidates should be provided with organ offer information and 88% reported that they would want to receive a copy of their patients' offer reports. Among 26 transplant program director respondents, 77% reported that candidates should not be notified of offers declined on their behalf. If organ offer reports were required, most program director respondents believed that they should include the reasons offers were declined and should not include offers for kidneys that were ultimately discarded. Conclusions: Most patients and nephrology providers, but only a minority of transplant program directors, supported the sharing of patient-facing information about individual deceased donor kidney offers that were declined on candidates' behalf.

Indexed as

kidney allocationkidney transplantshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID40303216
PMCPMC12034868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.