ArticleKidney international reports2025
Patient and Provider Attitudes Toward Patient-Facing Kidney Organ Offer Reporting.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kidney Transplant Candidates With High Frequency Deceased Donor Offers.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Outcomes for Patients With a Deceased Donor Kidney Offer in the New Allocation System.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: In the United States (US), deceased donor kidney offers are most commonly declined by transplant centers on behalf of waitlisted candidates, without notifying them. We sought to understand patient and provider attitudes toward patient-facing organ offer reporting. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of patients, nephrologists, and nephrology social workers on the National Kidney Foundation mailing list and the medical and surgical directors of US kidney transplant programs. Results: Among 755 patient respondents, 64% wanted to receive organ offer reports. Patients who wanted organ offer information were younger, more likely to be of a non-White race, and more likely to be on dialysis or on the waiting list. Of the patients, 87% reported that centers should be required to tell candidates about the offers they receive, and 62% reported that candidates should be informed after every offer. Among the 107 nephrology respondents, 73% reported that candidates should be provided with organ offer information and 88% reported that they would want to receive a copy of their patients' offer reports. Among 26 transplant program director respondents, 77% reported that candidates should not be notified of offers declined on their behalf. If organ offer reports were required, most program director respondents believed that they should include the reasons offers were declined and should not include offers for kidneys that were ultimately discarded. Conclusions: Most patients and nephrology providers, but only a minority of transplant program directors, supported the sharing of patient-facing information about individual deceased donor kidney offers that were declined on candidates' behalf.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.