Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303211›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2025

Conservative Kidney Management in the Middle East and North Africa: Attitudes, Practices, and Implementation Barriers.

Sahar H Koubar, Taha Hatab, Farah Abdul Razzak, Imed Helal, Ala Ali, Abdulhafid Shebani, Saleh Kaysi, David Gunderman, Akram Al-Makki, Sara N Davison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sahar H KoubarDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Taha HatabDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Farah Abdul RazzakDepartment of Internal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center/Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Imed HelalDepartment of Nephrology and Internal Medicine, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Ala AliMedical Department, Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Center, Baghdad, Iraq.
Abdulhafid ShebaniNephrology Department, Tripoli University Hospital, Tripoli, Libya.
Saleh KaysiDepartment of Nephrology, Brugmann University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
David GundermanIndiana University Health-Arnett, Indiana University School of Medicine-West Lafayette, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Akram Al-MakkiIndiana University Health-Arnett, Indiana University School of Medicine-West Lafayette, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Sara N DavisonFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Division of Nephrology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Conservative kidney management (CKM) is poorly developed and not easily accessible globally, especially in middle- and low-income countries. This study aimed to understand the perspectives of nephrologists on CKM and the barriers to its implementation in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Methods: We conducted an online survey. Nephrologists were contacted through their local nephrology societies. Responses were divided into the following 3 groups as per the country's income classification by the World Bank: high-, middle-, and low-income. Results: A total of 336 surveys were analyzed (response rate: 34.28%). The mean age of participants was 43.3 ± 9.8 years; 50% were male, 91% practiced in urban settings, and 18% were affiliated with academic centers. Of the participants, 76% were from middle-income countries. Nearly 80% of the participants were aware of CKM, and 65% accepted CKM as a treatment modality for kidney failure. However, only 20% consistently offered CKM to their patients and only 16% had a formal CKM program at their institution. Among these, 12% had a multidisciplinary team and only 6% had formal CKM training. The major perceived barriers to CKM implementation were financial and resource constraints (37.7% and 32.7%, respectively). Cultural and religious barriers constituted 18.3% and 8.6%, respectively, and were similar among the 3 income groups. Conclusion: Despite the significant awareness of CKM in the MENA region, its implementation remains poor. Key barriers include financial limitations, resource shortages, and a lack of training. Regional and national research is required to address these challenges and guide policies to improve CKM accessibility and implementation.

Indexed as

attitudesbarriersconservative kidney managementlow-incomeMENA

Identifiers

PMID40303211
PMCPMC12034881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.