Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303115›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2024

The Effect of Partial and Temporary Vaccination on African Swine Fever Eradication Rates.

Vincenzo Gervasi, Vittorio Guberti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vincenzo GervasiIstituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6773-9227
Vittorio GubertiIstituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4319-2482

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) is one of the most severe diseases of pigs, with drastic impact on pig industry. Wild boar populations play the role of ASF virus epidemiological reservoir. No effective and safe ASF vaccine is available, yet, but a future vaccine will not be 100% effective and will provide protection for no more than a few months. We present an individual-based spatially explicit model of wild boar demography and ASF epidemiology, allowing to simulate a vaccination campaign. We tested how many animals should be vaccinated in relation to vaccine efficacy and to the duration of vaccine protection. We estimated how these parameters will affect ASF eradication probabilities. We also assessed how partial vaccination will interact with a series of ecological, epidemiological, and management-related factors linked to ASF persistence. In the case of a highly effective vaccine with short duration, eradication chances were generally low, and the virus disappeared only when simulating a high effort (2.5 vaccinated wild boars/km

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusDisease EradicationVaccinationViral VaccinesAnimalsSus scrofaSwineViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID40303115
PMCPMC12016901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.