Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Bing LiangMOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health and Food Safety and Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of Animal Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6501-3571
Menglu FanMOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health and Food Safety and Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of Animal Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8191-600X
Qi MengMOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health and Food Safety and Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of Animal Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1005-5648
Jiayu JinMOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health and Food Safety and Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of Animal Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0131-9791
Na ChenMOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health and Food Safety and Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of Animal Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0095-8310
Yuanlu LuMOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health and Food Safety and Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of Animal Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1868-2439
Chenfeng JiangMOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health and Food Safety and Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of Animal Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1468-7250
Xingxing ZhangMOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health and Food Safety and Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of Animal Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0777-901X
Zongyou ZouMOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health and Food Safety and Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of Animal Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9114-4592
Jihui PingMOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health and Food Safety and Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of Animal Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4583-2575
Juan SuMOE International Joint Collaborative Research Laboratory for Animal Health and Food Safety and Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of Animal Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6239-1711
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
As the H9N2 subtype avian influenza virus (H9N2 AIV) evolves naturally, mutations in the hemagglutinin (HA) protein still occur, which involves some sites with glycosylations. It is widely established that glycosylation of the H9N2 AIV HA protein has a major impact on the antigenicity and pathogenicity of the virus. However, the biological implications of a particular glycosylation modification site (GMS) have not been well investigated. In this study, we generated viruses with different GMSs based on wild-type (WT) viruses. Antigenicity studies revealed that the presence of viruses with a 200G
Indexed as
Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusInfluenza A Virus, H9N2 SubtypeOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsAnimalsFemaleGlycosylationInfluenza in BirdsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CVirulenceHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Effects of the Glycosylation of the HA Protein of H9N2 Subtype Avian Influenza Virus on the Pathogenicity in Mice and Antigenicity. · full record | OpenQuestion