Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303053›Full record

SynthesisTransboundary and emerging diseases2024

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Biosecurity in Disease Prevention and Control in Livestock Farms in Africa.

Ronald Vougat Ngom, Gaspard J Ayissi, Adonis M M Akoussa, Andrea Laconi, Saleh M Jajere, Henriette A Zangue, Alessandra Piccirillo

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ronald Vougat NgomSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Sciences, University of Ngaoundere, Ngaoundere 454, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4385-6744
Gaspard J AyissiSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Sciences, University of Ngaoundere, Ngaoundere 454, Cameroon.
Adonis M M AkoussaSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Sciences, University of Ngaoundere, Ngaoundere 454, Cameroon.
Andrea LaconiDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Legnaro 35020, Italy.
Saleh M JajereDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, Legnaro 35020, Italy.
Henriette A ZangueSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Sciences, University of Ngaoundere, Ngaoundere 454, Cameroon.
Alessandra PiccirilloDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Legnaro 35020, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Africa, livestock production plays a crucial role for sustainable food security and economic growth. However, the development of this sector has been delayed by livestock diseases, one of the main constraints, which can cause important production and economic losses. To overcome these constraints, farmers extensively use antimicrobials, which in turn can lead to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), one of the main threats to global health and food security. Biosecurity has been identified as a key strategy to reduce livestock diseases. Therefore, the current systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted according to the Cochrane guideline, aimed at determining the efficacy of biosecurity in preventing and controlling infectious diseases in livestock farms in Africa. Of the 1408 records retrieved from five different databases, only 16 met the inclusion criteria. These studies were conducted in Egypt (31.2%), Nigeria (31.2%), Uganda (18.8%), Ethiopia (12.5%) and Tunisia (6.3%) and concerned poultry (62.4%), pigs (18.8%) and cattle (18.8%). Investigations focused mainly on avian influenza (AI) (15.0%) and coccidiosis (10.0%) in poultry and African swine fever (ASF) (10.0%) in pigs. In poultry farms, the results of the pairwise meta-analysis showed that biosecurity measures related to visitors and farmworkers could be effective at reducing the risk of introduction and spread of AI viruses (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.82). Moreover, inadequate biosecurity seemed to be a factor promoting coccidiosis (OR = 4.20; 95% CI 2.4-7.4) and AI (OR = 1.74; 95% CI 1.23-2.48). Prevention of ASF was significantly associated with the application of biosecurity measures related to animals' transport, removal of carcasses and manure (OR = 0.33; 95% CI 0.12-0.88). Despite their importance, these findings cannot be translated to the entire African continent, since no studies were available for more than 90% of its countries. More research should be carried out to fill in the gaps identified by this review.

Indexed as

Animal DiseasesAnimal HusbandryBiosecurityLivestockAfricaAnimalsFarmsAfricaAfrican swine feveravian influenzabiosecuritycattlecoccidiosispigspoultryreview

Identifiers

PMID40303053
PMCPMC12016774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.