Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303048›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2024

Evaluation of Aggregate Oral Fluids for African Swine Fever Real-Time PCR Diagnostics Using Samples Collected on Romanian Farms with an Active Outbreak.

Chungwon Joseph Chung, Marta D Remmenga, Sarah R Mielke, Matthew Branan, Andrei Daniel Mihalca, Oana-Maria Balmos, David Adrian Balaban Oglan, Alexandru Supeanu, Attila Farkas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chungwon Joseph ChungForeign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (FADDL) United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Veterinary Services (VS) National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL), P.O. Box 848, Greenport 11944, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4525-5539
Marta D RemmengaUSDA APHIS VS Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health (CEAH), Fort Collins 80526-8117, CO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6518-7068
Sarah R MielkeUSDA APHIS VS Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health (CEAH), Fort Collins 80526-8117, CO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0547-2221
Matthew BrananUSDA APHIS VS Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health (CEAH), Fort Collins 80526-8117, CO, USA.
Andrei Daniel MihalcaUniversity of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Oana-Maria BalmosUniversity of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8847-8292
David Adrian Balaban OglanFatrom Aditivi Furajeri S.R.L., Pantelimon 077145, Romania.
Alexandru SupeanuNational Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority (ANSVSA), București, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5638-921X
Attila FarkasCarthage Veterinary Service, P.O. Box 220, Carthage 62321, IL, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0602-5543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF), caused by African swine fever virus (ASFv), is a highly contagious disease of domestic and wild pigs with a mortality rate that can reach 100%. Continuous spread of the virus into ASF-free regions, including the Caribbean island of Hispaniola in 2021, is causing socioeconomic burdens and presents a threat to food security. Pork-producing countries, including the United States and Canada, are urgently looking for efficient tools for early detection to reduce spread of the virus in the event of an outbreak. Previous experimental infection studies evaluated the utility of aggregate porcine oral fluids (OFs) as a sample type with a highly sensitive ASFv real-time PCR for individual blood and tissue-based diagnosis. In this study, real-time PCR with porcine OFs was further evaluated to better understand diagnostic performance using samples from three Romanian farms with an ongoing ASF outbreak. In this limited dataset using a Bayesian latent class model, no statistical difference in diagnostic sensitivity was found between the real-time PCR using aggregate OFs and the process of determining pen disease status by testing individual blood samples collected from a subset of pigs from the same pen. Known negative aggregate OF samples from pigs in the United States had no occurrences of false positives, suggesting reliable diagnostic specificity of the sample matrix used for this study. Until results are produced from further studies with sufficient sample size, aggregate OF testing using real-time PCR could cautiously be used as a supplementary sample type for ASF diagnosis alongside currently approved sample types, including blood and lymphoid tissues.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusDisease OutbreaksReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSalivaAnimalsFarmsRomaniaSensitivity and SpecificitySwine

Identifiers

PMID40303048
PMCPMC12017018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.