ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2024
Exploring Options for Syndromic Surveillance in Aquaculture: Outbreak Detection of Salmon Pancreas Disease Using Production Data from Norwegian Farms.
Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Syndromic surveillance (SyS) is an important tool for early warning and monitoring of health in human and animal populations, but its use in aquaculture has been limited. Our study objective was to design a SyS system for Atlantic salmon aquaculture and to evaluate its performance in detecting pancreas disease (PD) outbreaks caused by salmonid alphaviruses on farms. We defined SyS outbreak alarms as cases where monthly farm mortality exceeded predefined cutoffs or deviated significantly from expected values based on predictive generalized linear models. These models were trained for each salmon production area in Norway, using data from 2014 to 2017. The outcome variable was fish mortality per farm-month, and input variables were production and environmental predictors, as well as an offset for the number of fish at risk. We also added autoregressive components to explain temporal dependency within fish cohorts. Subsequently, data from 2018 to 2021 was used to parameterize and validate the SyS system's performance against the current national PD surveillance program, which relies on routine farm-screening tests using molecular techniques and reports of clinical findings. The study covered 19,119 farm-months, involving 1,618 fish cohorts. The performance of our SyS system varied across production areas, with sensitivity ranging from 80.5% to 87.4% and a false alarm rate of 45.3%-53.2%. The absence of alarms was usually observed in farms that were truly negative for PD, i.e., a negative predictive value range of 81.2%-94.0%. The median time for alarms being raised was either in the same month as the current PD surveillance program or 1 month prior or after it. Our results indicate that the SyS system is a valuable tool for monitoring mortality on salmon farms, but alarms are unspecific if evaluated against an individual disease (PD). Increasing the frequency and granularity of mortality reporting might improve the SyS system's performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.