Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303015›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2024

Effectiveness of Passive and Active Surveillance for Early Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Mink during the 2020 Outbreak in the Netherlands.

Inge M G A Santman-Berends, Gerdien van Schaik, Marieke Augustijn-Schretlen, Irene P I H Bisschop, Jan de Rond, Paola A Meijer, Harold M J F van der Heijden, Francisca C Velkers, Marion P G Koopmans, Wim H M van der Poel and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Inge M G A Santman-BerendsDepartment of Research and Development, Royal GD, Deventer, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4628-8479
Gerdien van SchaikDepartment of Research and Development, Royal GD, Deventer, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0460-2629
Marieke Augustijn-SchretlenDepartment of Poultry Health, Royal GD, Deventer, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0373-5497
Irene P I H BisschopDepartment of Research and Development, Royal GD, Deventer, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8881-6535
Jan de RondDepartment of Poultry Health, Royal GD, Deventer, Netherlands.
Paola A MeijerDepartment of Research and Development, Royal GD, Deventer, Netherlands.
Harold M J F van der HeijdenDepartment of Research and Development, Royal GD, Deventer, Netherlands.
Francisca C VelkersDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Marion P G KoopmansDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5204-2312
Wim H M van der PoelWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, Netherlands.
Lidwien A M SmitInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0292-0946
Arjan J A StegemanDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4361-3846
Reina S SikkemaDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7331-6274
Bas B Oude MunninkDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9394-1189
Renate W Hakze-van der HoningWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7621-2729
Robert-Jan MolenaarDepartment of Poultry Health, Royal GD, Deventer, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0336-1226

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Starting December 2019, a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) spread among humans across the world. From 2020 onward, farmed mink were found susceptible to the virus. In this paper, we describe the Dutch surveillance system and the added surveillance components for early detection of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks and their results in Dutch mink farms. In the Netherlands, a surveillance system was in place in which mink farmers could submit carcasses for postmortem evaluation and could contact a telephone helpdesk for veterinary advise. Through this system, the first SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in two mink farms was detected in April 2020. Immediately, the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture commissioned a consortium of statutory and research institutes to intensify the surveillance system. The program consisted of both passive surveillance, i.e., mandatory notifications and active surveillance components, i.e., serological screenings and weekly risk-based sampling of dead mink for early detection of new SARS-CoV-2 infections. When one of the surveillance components indicated a suspicion of a possible SARS-CoV-2 infection, follow-up samplings were conducted and at confirmation, all mink were culled. During 2020, 67 out of 124 mink farms that were under surveillance became infected with SARS-CoV-2 (54%). Of these, 31 were detected based on clinical signs (passive surveillance of clinical signs) and 36 were detected through active surveillance. From the mink farms with a new SARS-CoV-2 outbreak that was detected through the surveillance, in 19% of the farms (

Indexed as

COVID-19Disease OutbreaksMinkSARS-CoV-2AnimalsNetherlands

Identifiers

PMID40303015
PMCPMC12016721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.