ArticlePNAS nexus2025
Revisiting the classical biodiversity-ecosystem functioning and stability relationships in microbial microcosms.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of tuberculosis and its treatment on the lung and gut microbiota: a global systematic review, meta-analysis, and amplicon-based metagenomic meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- From the leaf to the gut and back again: using synthetic bacterial communities to trace the fate and influence of phyllosphere bacteria in an Arabidopsis-Pieris brassicae system.Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
- Urban forest restoration enhances soil microbial functional potential and functional insurance via shifts in β-diversity.Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
- Deterministic assembly and centralized networks define theFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Coupling between bacterial phylogenetic diversity and heterotrophic productivity in a coastal ecosystem affected by estuarine plumes.ISME communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The question of how biodiversity influences ecosystem functioning and stability has been a central focus in ecological research. Yet, this question remains unresolved, primarily because of the widely divergent definitions of functioning, stability, and diversity. Consequently, forecasts of ecosystem services will remain speculative until we can establish more precise and comprehensive definitions for these concepts than previously. Here, we investigated how the maximum specific growth rate, productivity, mortality rate, and species interaction in microbial communities vary with a diversity gradient ranging from 1 to 16 species under control conditions, starvation, or saline stress. We found that diversity played a critical role in maintaining community growth and stability under control conditions, with higher diversity associated with increased maximum specific growth rate and decreased mortality rate. However, higher diversity was associated with an increased mortality rate under starvation, while diversity did not affect the mortality rate under saline stress. Diversity stabilized microbial productivity only under control conditions, defying the "diversity begets stability" hypothesis under stress. Beneficial interactions among species were prevalent in most samples, but species interaction increased mortality rates under starvation. Our findings suggest that while biodiversity is crucial for preserving ecosystem functioning and stability, the presence of multiple definitions and contextual dependence on environmental conditions argues against any general relationship between diversity and ecosystem functioning/stability. Furthermore, we provide new insights into the longstanding debate surrounding the "diversity begets stability" hypothesis and the "diversity destabilizes ecosystem" hypothesis in that diversity begets stability under control conditions but destabilizes ecosystems under severe stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.