ArticleJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2025
Developing risk models for predicting incidence of diabetes and prediabetes in the first-degree relatives of Iranian patients with type 2 diabetes and comparison with the finnish diabetes risk score.
Article in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to develop risk models for predicting the onset of developing diabetes and prediabetes in the first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with type 2 diabetes, who have normal glucose tolerance (NGT). Materials and Methods: In this study, 1765 FDRs of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, who had NGT, were subjected to the statistical analysis. Diabetes risk factors, including anthropometric indices, physical activity, fast plasma glucose, plasma glucose concentrations 2-h after oral glucose administration, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), blood pressure, and lipid profile at the baseline were considered as independent variables. Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, univariate, and multivariable proportional hazard Cox regression were used for the data analysis. The optimal cutoff value for risk score was created according to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: The best diabetes predictability was achieved by a model in which waist-to-hip ratio, HbA1c, oral glucose tolerance test-area under the curve (OGTT-AUC), and the lipid profile were included. The best prediabetes risk model included HbA1c, OGTT-AUC, systolic blood pressure, and the lipid profile. The predictive ability of multivariable risk models was compared with fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HbA1c, and OGTT. The predictive ability of developed models was higher than FPG and HbA1c; however, it was comparable with OGTT-AUC alone. In addition, our study showed that the developed models predicted diabetes and OGTT-AUC better than the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC). Conclusion: We recommend regular monitoring of risk factors for the FDRs of patients with type 2 diabetes as an efficient approach for predicting and prevention of the occurrence of diabetes and prediabetes in future. Our developed diabetes risk score models showed precise prediction ability compared to the FINDRISC in Iranian population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.