Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40302996›Full record

ReviewJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2025

Vaccination versus natural infection: A review of antibody differentiation techniques.

Vaishnavi H Mishra, Pratham Gupta, Nandkishor J Bankar, Obaid Noman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vaishnavi H MishraDepartment of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Pratham GuptaDepartment of Microbiology, Datta Meghe Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Nandkishor J BankarDepartment of Microbiology, Datta Meghe Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Obaid NomanDepartment of Pathology, Datta Meghe Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production of specific antibodies occurs in response to pathogens, whether encountered naturally or introduced through vaccination, serving as markers of immunity. As novel vaccines are developed and deployed, especially in response to emerging infectious diseases, the ability to distinguish between vaccine-induced and infection-induced antibodies becomes increasingly important. Vaccines are designed to mimic this natural infection process without causing the disease itself. Serological assays are critical tools in immunology, enabling researchers and clinicians to differentiate between antibodies produced by vaccination and those generated by natural infection. By understanding whether an individual's antibodies are the result of previous infection or vaccination, healthcare providers can modify booster recommendations more effectively. It also plays an important role in identifying people with hybrid immunity and in assessing the effectiveness of vaccination campaigns.

Indexed as

Antibody differentiationhybrid immunitynatural infectionserological assaysvaccine-induced immunity

Identifiers

PMID40302996
PMCPMC12039864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.