Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40302992›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2025

Intra- and inter-scanner CT variability and their impact on diagnostic tasks.

Isabel Montero, Saman Sotoudeh-Paima, Ehsan Abadi, Ehsan Samei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isabel MonteroCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University, NC, United States.
Saman Sotoudeh-PaimaCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University, NC, United States.
Ehsan AbadiCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University, NC, United States.
Ehsan SameiCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University, NC, United States.

Funding

TR&D Project 3: Virtual ReadersP41EB028744 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Ehsan Samei · 2021 to 2026
$7.8M
Accuracy and Precision in CT Quantification of COPD Through Virtual Imaging TrialsR01HL155293 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ABADI, EHSAN · 2021 to 2025
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155293NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increased development and production of Computed Tomography (CT) scanner technology has expanded patient access to advanced and affordable medical imaging technologies but has also introduced sources of variability in the clinical imaging landscape, which may influence patient care. This study examines the impact of intra-scanner and inter-scanner variability on image quality and quantitative imaging tasks, with a focus on the detectability index (d') as a measure of patient-specific task performance. We evaluated 813 clinical phantom image sets from the COPDGene study, aggregated by CT scanner make, model, and acquisition and reconstruction protocol. Each phantom image set was assessed for image quality metrics, including the Noise Power Spectrum (NPS) and in-plane Modulation Transfer Function (MTF). The d' index was calculated for 12 hypothetical lesion detection tasks, emulating clinically relevant lung and liver lesions of varying sizes and contrast levels. Qualitatively, analysis showed intra-scanner variability in NPS and MTF curves measured for identical acquisition and reconstruction settings. Inter-scanner comparisons demonstrated variability in d' measurements across different scanner makes and models, of similar acquisition and reconstruction settings. The study showed an intra-scanner variability of up to 13.7% and an inter-scanner variability of up to 19.3% in the d' index. These findings emphasize the need for considering scanner variability in patient-centered care and indicate that CT technology may influence the reliability of imaging tasks. The results of this study further motivate the development of virtual scanner models to better model and mitigate the variability observed in the clinical imaging landscape.

Indexed as

Computed tomographydetectability indexvariability assessment

Identifiers

PMID40302992
PMCPMC12035824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.