Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40302975›Full record

ArticlePediatric diabetes2024

Developing a General Population Screening Programme for Paediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Evidence from a Qualitative Study of the Perspectives and Attitudes of Parents.

Lauren M Quinn, Parth Narendran, Kirandeep Bhavra, Felicity Boardman, Sheila M Greenfield, Matthew J Randell, Ian Litchfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric diabetes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Insights into Knowledge and Attitudes About Autoantibody Screening from People Affected by Type 1 Diabetes: A Brief Report.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lauren M QuinnInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0500-4417
Parth NarendranInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4583-8793
Kirandeep BhavraSandwell and West Birmingham NHS Foundation, Birmingham B71 4HJ, UK.
Felicity BoardmanDivision of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Warwick CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3268-6276
Sheila M GreenfieldInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8796-4114
Matthew J RandellDivision of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Warwick CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5856-3007
Ian LitchfieldInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1169-5392

Funding

DS NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: With reliable tests and preventative treatments now available the United Kingdom has introduced a prototype population-based paediatric (ages 3-13) screening programme for type 1 diabetes (T1D). To aid its ethical and sustainable implementation this work explores parental views around the concept of this programme to determine how their involvement might be encouraged and supported. Results: Regarding Conclusions: The benefits of T1D screening need to be clearly communicated to facilitate uptake. To this end the use of decision-support tools and better targeted educational materials should be explored. Post-testing, parents expressed preferences for peer support and access to psychological counselling.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Mass ScreeningParentsAdolescentAdultAttitude to HealthChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleProgram DevelopmentQualitative ResearchUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID40302975
PMCPMC12017103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.