Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40302953›Full record

ArticlePediatric diabetes2024

Real-World Accuracy of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System after Radiologic Exposure.

Siobhan Tellez, Lindsey Hornung, Emily Smith, Andrew Trout, Samuel Brady, Colleen Lowe, Joshua Courter, Maisam Abu-El-Haija, Deborah Elder

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric diabetes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05607576 (Accuracy of Dexcom G6 After Radiation Exposure-A Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05607576 nacompletednot on this map

Accuracy of Dexcom G6 After Radiation Exposure-A Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis

TypeinterventionalSponsorDeborah ElderRan2022 to 2024Enrolled18ConditionsDiabetesArmsUncovered CGM during radiologic procedures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Siobhan TellezDivision of Endocrinology Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3631-0313
Lindsey HornungDivision of Biostatistics and Epidemiology Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0722-7307
Emily SmithDivision of Endocrinology Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1439-0938
Andrew TroutDepartment of Radiology Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1431-4054
Samuel BradyDepartment of Radiology Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2785-4626
Colleen LoweDivision of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-4374-2615
Joshua CourterDivision of Pharmacy Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Maisam Abu-El-HaijaDepartment of Pediatrics University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Deborah ElderDivision of Endocrinology Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6417-3619

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The increasing use of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) necessitates a review of variables that impact accuracy and interrupt use. Manufacturer recommendations include removing CGMs before diagnostic imaging, such as X-ray and computed tomography (CT). Early removal and replacement of CGM components present financial, clinical, and psychosocial burdens to the wearer and interrupt optimal management of diabetes for pediatric patients who receive a total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT). The study's aim was to evaluate the effect of scatter dose exposure during X-ray or CT if the CGM remained intact but outside the field of view (FoV). Materials and Methods: Participants were followed through the first 3 months after TPIAT surgery, managed diabetes with an insulin pump and CGM, and were routinely exposed to diagnostic imaging. Participants' CGMs were unshielded by a protective apron during any X-ray or CT procedures for the duration of the study period, and the transmitter was collected after expiration or removal. Glucometer data was collected from hospital records and home glucometer downloads. Mixed models were used to analyze absolute differences between matched CGM and glucometer values, and Clarke error grid analyses (EGA) were performed. Scatter dose exposure was derived using anthropomorphic phantoms and calculated retrospectively. Results: A total of 14 patients (median 12.2 years, 64% female) received a median of five diagnostic imaging procedures with a median cumulative scatter dose of 559 Conclusion: Scatter dose exposure from diagnostic imaging did not affect the clinical accuracy of CGM values for the duration of transmitter use. Leaving CGM components in place when not in the FoV during diagnostic imaging successfully mitigated interruptions to use and undue burden or cost to participants.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Radiation ExposureAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolContinuous Glucose MonitoringFemaleHumansIslets of Langerhans TransplantationMalePancreatectomyRadiation DosageTomography, X-Ray ComputedBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID40302953
PMCPMC12017230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.