ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Social support and psychological distress of patients with pituitary adenomas: chain-mediated effects of self-efficacy and rumination.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From rumination quagmire to hope's flame: a cross-sectional mediation study of family support and life satisfaction among hematological cancer caregivers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- eHealth literacy and health responsibility among older adults: the serial indirect roles of self-efficacy and social support based on the health promotion model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Perceived stress and mental health in perimenopausal women: a serial mediation study of psychological distress and social support.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Psychological distress in patients with pituitary adenomas affects their quality of life and is influenced by various aspects such as sociocultural factors, personal resources, and stressors. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the chain-mediated role of self-efficacy and rumination in the relationship between social support and psychological distress. Methods: The study was based on the Wilson-Cleary model of health-related quality of life and self-efficacy theory. We investigated 500 patients with surgically treated pituitary adenomas in three tertiary hospitals in Shaanxi Province, China. We used the "Social Support" and "General Self-Efficacy" scales, "Rumination Scale," and the "Psychological Distress in Patients with Pituitary Adenomas" questionnaire to conduct the survey, and the data were analyzed using structural equation modeling and bootstrap methods to examine the relationships between the variables. Results: The results showed that there was a significant positive correlation between social support and self-efficacy, social support and self-efficacy negatively predicted rumination and psychological distress, respectively. Rumination significant positive correlation with psychological distress, and social support, indirectly affected psychological distress through the chain-mediated effect of self-efficacy and rumination. This represents a compound multiple mediating effect on psychological distress. Discussion: Clinical practitioners should enhance social support for patients with pituitary adenomas, improve patients' self-efficacy, and mitigate rumination to reduce patients' psychological distress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.