ArticleJournal of orthodontic science2025
Prediction of overbite improvement in deep bite correction using clear aligner therapy.
Article in Journal of orthodontic science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of attachment design and location on derotation of mandibular second premolars : A finite element analysis.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to determine the accuracy of overbite correction in patients with deep bite using the clear aligner therapy (CAT). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 31 patients prescribed orthodontic treatment using CAT from January 2020 to January 2024. Clinical information was collected via X-ray results at pre-treatment and post-treatment stages. Treatment outcomes were measured at three stages: pre-treatment, post-treatment (clinical results), and predict treatment (predict results) as programmed in ClinCheck®.
resultsSignificant changes were observed in X-ray in both overbite (3.85 ± 1.38 mm to 2.93 ± 1.13 mm) and overjet (5.19 ± 1.79 mm to 3.43 ± 1.14 mm) following CAT. For clinical crown lengthening (CCL) of tooth 31, significant differences were noted between pre-treatment and post-treatment (-0.31 ± 0.66 mm) and between predicted and clinical results (-0.21 ± 0.58 mm). For CCL of tooth 41, significant differences were found between pre-treatment and post-treatment (-0.36 ± 0.66 mm) and between prediction and post-treatment (-0.32 ± 0.65 mm). The percentage of deep bites differed significantly between pre-treatment vs predicted treatment (38.10 ± 14.90%), pre-treatment vs post-treatment (11.80 ± 14.30%), and predicted treatment vs post-treatment (-26.40 ± 12.60%). Similar trends were observed in mean overbite (2.77 ± 1.07 mm, 0.69 ± 0.93 mm, and - 2.08 ± 0.83 mm, respectively).
conclusionsOur findings support the use of CAT as a reliable and aesthetic option for treating deep bite malocclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.