ReviewJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2025
Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Implications of Genomic Medicine and Precision Oncology.
Review in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic significance and pathological correlation analysis of DKK4 in colorectal cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Advances in Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: How Precision Medicine Is Changing the Game.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approximately 10% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases occur in the context of hereditary cancer-predisposing conditions caused by germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in cancer predisposition genes, with Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis at the top of the list. Although the identification of hereditary CRC has traditionally relied on clinical characteristics, including familial accumulation, multiple and early onset of CRC and other related cancers, and the presence of gastrointestinal polyposis, more comprehensive approaches, such as universal tumor screening and universal germline testing, have recently been employed. From a technical standpoint, next-generation sequencing has enabled genome-wide analysis of genetic alterations in germline and somatic settings. Taking advantage of this technology, germline multigene panel testing has been utilized in genetic testing, which leads to the identification of PVs, not only in well-known hereditary CRC genes but also in rare causal genes, moderate-risk genes, and high-risk genes previously not linked to CRC predisposition. In addition, comprehensive genomic profiling and companion diagnostics for solid tumors occasionally yield unexpected hereditary CRC diagnoses. Thus, more hereditary CRCs have been identified not based on clinical phenotypes but rather by comprehensive approaches or as secondary findings of treatment drug testing. In this review, we discuss the impact of recent advances in genomic medicine on the clinical aspects of hereditary CRC, which has promoted an understanding of the entire landscape of genetic predisposition to CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.