Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40302842›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2025

Current insights on temporary mechanical circulatory support in adults with post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock.

Ahmad Mahajna, Sascha Ott, Assad Haneya, Jürgen Leick, Kevin Pilarczyk, Sharaf-Eldin Shehada, Gil Bolotin, Roberto Lorusso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ahmad MahajnaCardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht 6202 AZ, The Netherlands.
Sascha OttDepartment of Cardiac Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Augustenburger Pl. 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Assad HaneyaHeart Centre Trier, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Barmherzige Brueder Hospital, Nordallee 1, Trier 54292, Germany.
Jürgen LeickHeart Centre Trier, Department of Internal Medicine III/Cardiology, Barmherzigen Brueder Hospital, Nordallee 1, Trier 54292, Germany.
Kevin PilarczykIntensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Klinikum Hochsauerland GmbH, Stolte Ley 5, Arnsberg 59759, Germany.
Sharaf-Eldin ShehadaDepartment for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen 45147, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1638-0493
Gil BolotinCardiac Surgery Department, Rambam Medical Center Campus, PO Box 9602, Haifa 3109601, Israel.
Roberto LorussoCardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht 6202 AZ, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1777-2045

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) is a critical condition characterized by persistent low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) that manifests either as an inability to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) or as severe cardiac dysfunction in the immediate post-operative period despite optimal medical therapy. With an incidence of 2-20%, PCCS is associated with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare resource utilization. This review explores the pathophysiology of PCCS while emphasizing mechanisms such as direct myocardial damage, ischaemia-reperfusion injury, and systemic effects of extracorporeal circulation. It also discusses key diagnostic tools for PCCS including echocardiography, pulmonary artery catheters, vasoactive inotropic scores (VIS), and lactate clearance, which facilitate early recognition and management. Treatment pathways centred on temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS), tailored to clinical scenarios such as the inability to wean from CPB or refractory LCOS. The pivotal role of the multi-disciplinary Heart Team in decision-making, collaboration, and patient-centred care is highlighted. Finally, weaning protocols and considerations for long-term outcomes are discussed, underscoring the need for timely interventions and a personalized approach. Advances in PCCS management continue to evolve, aiming to improve survival and long-term outcomes for this high-risk population.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary bypassHeart TeamLow cardiac output syndromeMulti-disciplinary carePost-cardiotomy cardiogenic shockTemporary mechanical circulatory support

Identifiers

PMID40302842
PMCPMC12036523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.