ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Clinical evaluation of etiological co-variables, characteristics, and treatment modalities of noncarious cervical lesions.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative clinical evaluation of direct-indirect heat tempered and direct composite restoration technique in noncarious cervical lesions: A split-mouth randomized clinical.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) pose a clinical challenge due to multifactorial aetiology and varied clinical presentations, making it essential to understand their characteristics and treatment modalities to improve treatment outcomes. Aim and Objectives: To study multifactorial aetiology, clinical characteristics and management using tooth-coloured materials. Materials and Methods: Patient's case history was noted to determine aetiology and characteristics of NCCL. Study included 180 teeth, divided in two main groups based on shape of the lesion- Group 1( Results: RMGIC demonstrated least postoperative sensitivity in wedge-shaped lesions compared to bulk-fill-flowable and packable composites. All materials showed similar performance in wedge-shaped lesions, but RMGIC exhibited higher surface roughness in saucer-shaped lesions. Packable composites showed more marginal staining in wedge-shaped lesions, while RMGIC had the least staining in saucer-shaped lesions. Conclusion: Understanding the interplay between abrasion, biocorrosion, and abfraction is crucial for long-term treatment outcomes. The overall performance of RMGIC was better for wedge shaped, and bulk-fill flowable performed better in saucer shaped lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.