ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Comparison of peri-cervical dentin on conservative and conventional access cavity designs with waveone gold and hyflex electrical discharge machining instrumentation using cone-beam computed tomography - An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Access cavity in endodontics: Balancing precision, preservation, and clinical needs.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Successful endodontic therapy depends on multiple factors, with root canal preparation being a critical step in the process. Maintaining the natural anatomy of the root canal system during biomechanical preparation is important. Deviation from the canal's original morphology can lead to complications, such as canal aberrations, including transportation. Proper attention to canal preparation techniques and advanced file systems can help preserve the canal's natural curvature, ensuring effective treatment and reducing the possibility of errors in procedure. This research compares and assesses the effects of two single-file systems, waveone gold and hyflex electrical discharge machining (EDM), through the use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) on peri-cervical dentin (PCD). Materials and Methods: Forty mandibular molar teeth that were extracted were selected and prepared using both rotary and reciprocating single-file systems. The teeth were grouped into four categories with each containing ten teeth. CBCT scans were performed before and following the instrumentation to assess the remaining PCD thickness. An independent t-test with a 5% significance level was used to evaluate the data. Results: The findings indicated that the two systems differed statistically significantly, with the rotary system preserving more PCD (2.57 ± 0.03 mm) than the reciprocating system (2.45 ± 0.04 mm). Conclusion: The study results indicated that the Hyflex EDM single file system proved to be more effective in preserving PCD. However, additional studies are required to thoroughly assess the impact of Ni-Ti rotary single file systems on remaining dentin thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.