ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
'Focus on Frailty': Co-Designing Digital Frailty Education with Healthcare Students.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary Stakeholder Perspectives on the Design Needs of a Smart Walker for Fall Prevention Among Older Adults: A Qualitative Study in West Java, Indonesia.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Frailty is prevalent in hospitals and is associated with adverse events and poor health outcomes. In Australia, there is a need for co-designed, multidisciplinary, and contextually relevant frailty education to improve healthcare students' understanding and knowledge of frailty within the hospital setting. Objective: This study aimed to i) explore healthcare students' understanding of frailty and their experiences with patients who are frail, and ii) seek healthcare students' design ideas for the content of a new digital frailty education course. Methods: Participants were university students enrolled in a health-related degree. Online focus groups and interviews were conducted between August and September 2023. Participants were asked about their experiences with frailty education, older adults and people living with frailty; course content; education module topics; and the course name. Participants also completed a demographic questionnaire and a Research Engagement Feedback Survey. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze quantitative data. Qualitative data were analyzed using inductive template analysis, a type of codebook thematic analysis. Results: Four themes were identified: 1) Perception of frailty as loss and decline; 2) Limited education on frailty; 3) Frailty education connected to the reality of practice; and 4) Learning and practicing person-centered care. Module topics prioritized by students were 'identifying and assessing frailty' and 'understanding ageing, frailty, and geriatric conditions'. Participants advocated for a course name that was catchy and succinct, informing the course name: Discussion: Healthcare students expressed a desire to learn more about frailty and advocated for education that is skills-based, encourages practical application of knowledge, features storytelling and lived experiences, takes a holistic approach to frailty, and teaches person-centered care. Study findings will directly influence the design of education module topics and course content, and enhance Focus on Frailty's relevance to the Australian healthcare context across medicine, nursing and allied health practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.