ArticleInternational journal of public health2025
Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs in Switzerland - Quo Vadis?
Article in International journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators to population participation in colorectal cancer screening: an umbrella review.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- Cancer Screening Among Older Adults Above 75 Years of Age According to Health Status: A Population-Based Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- The Future of Implementation Science for Public Health and Healthcare: Insights From the Swiss Implementation Science Network (IMPACT) Conference 2024.International journal of public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most commonly diagnosed cancers in Switzerland. Supported by a solid evidence base for CRC screening, cantons have increasingly established organized screening programs. This report summarizes and discusses the state of this program landscape using findings from the Swiss Improving Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Implementation Science Study. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinical or administrative leads for Swiss CRC screening programs to understand key characteristics, including host organization, enrollment pathways, screening modalities, and program deliverers. Results: Eleven out of 13 existing or planned programs in 2021 participated, eight of which have been developed since 2020. All programs offer mail invitations to citizens 50-69 years old and fecal immunochemical testing, though positivity thresholds vary. Access to colonoscopy and the role of healthcare providers vary between programs. Conclusion: Cantonal influences on designing and implementing preventive services allow programs to adapt to local conditions. However, they also challenge opportunities for cross-program learning, efficiencies, and equity. Strengthening the infrastructure connecting programs for shared knowledge building and program improvement will be vital for sustaining Swiss organized CRC screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.