ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2025
Unlocking Responsive and Unresponsive Signatures: A Transfer Learning Approach for Automated Classification in Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Lesions.
Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) remains a significant global public health disease, with the critical distinction and exact detection between responsive and unresponsive cases dictating treatment strategies and patient outcomes. However, image-based methods for differentiating these groups are unexplored. This study addresses this gap by developing a deep learning (DL) model utilizing transfer learning to automatically identify responses in CL lesions. A dataset of 102 lesion images (51 per class; equally distributed across train, test, and validation sets) is employed. The DenseNet161, VGG16, and ResNet18 networks, pretrained on a massive image dataset, are fine-tuned for our specific task. The models achieved an accuracy of 76.47%, 73.53%, and 55.88% on the test data, respectively, with a sensitivity of 80%, 75%, and 100% and specificity of 73.68%, 72.22%, and 53.12%, individually. Transfer learning successfully addressed the limited sample size challenge, demonstrating the models' potential for real-world application. This work underscores the significance of automated response detection in CL, paving the way for treatment and improved patient outcomes. While acknowledging limitations like the sample size, the need for collaborative efforts is emphasized to expand datasets and further refine the model. This approach stands as a beacon of hope in the contest against CL, illuminating the path toward a future where data-driven diagnostics guide effective treatment and alleviate the suffering of countless patients. Moreover, the study could be a turning point in eliminating this important global public health and widespread disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.