Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40302728›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Machine Learning-Based Diagnosis of Cryptococcal Meningitis and Tuberculous Meningitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Clinical Study.

Fangbo Lin, Cheng Chen, Yuan Li, Hua Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fangbo LinRehabilitation Medicine Department, The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First Hospital of Changsha), Changsha, China.
Cheng ChenTuberculosis Department, The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First Hospital of Changsha), Changsha, China.
Yuan LiRehabilitation Medicine Department, The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First Hospital of Changsha), Changsha, China.
Hua LiuRehabilitation Medicine Department, The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First Hospital of Changsha), Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Differentiating cryptococcal meningitis from tuberculous meningitis is critical for initiating appropriate treatment and improving patient outcomes. However, overlapping pathogenic mechanisms, clinical presentations, laboratory findings, and imaging features complicate accurate diagnosis. Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center study at the First Hospital of Changsha, analyzing medical records from January 2021 to November 2024. A total of 271 patients were included: 125 diagnosed with cryptococcal meningitis and 146 with tuberculous meningitis. Using LASSO regression (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator), we identified 11 potential predictors, which were subsequently refined to 6 key variables: extracranial fungi, cerebrospinal fluid pressure, age, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, albumin levels, and India ink staining. A diagnostic nomogram was constructed through multivariate logistic regression and validated by receiver operating characteristic analysis, calibration plots, decision curve analysis, and SHAP tools (Shapley additive explanations) for model interpretability. Results: The optimized model incorporated 6 variables: extracranial fungal presence, cerebrospinal fluid pressure, patient age, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, albumin levels, and India ink staining. According to SHAP analysis, the significance of these factors in prediction was underscored. The model achieved an area under the curve of 0.919 for the training cohort and 0.921 for the validation cohort, demonstrating robust sensitivity and specificity across both data sets. Additionally, calibration plots and decision curve analysis validated the model's precision and its applicability in clinical settings. Conclusions: The developed nomogram accurately distinguishes cryptococcal meningitis from tuberculous meningitis with superior discriminative ability and clinical relevance, providing a valuable diagnostic tool for clinicians.

Indexed as

cryptococcal meningitisdiagnosismachine learningnomogramtuberculous meningitis

Identifiers

PMID40302728
PMCPMC12039806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.