ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Clinical Outcomes and Perspectives of People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Twelve Months After Initiation of Long-acting Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine in an Observational Real-world US Study (BEYOND).
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Long-Acting Cabotegravir Injections Are More Acceptable Than Long-Acting Lenacapavir Injections After One Dose: Results From the CLARITY Randomized Crossover Study.Advances in therapy · 2026Trial
- Feasibility, Fidelity, and Effectiveness of Administering Long-Acting Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine in Infusion Centers in the United States: Findings From the Phase 4 GLACIER Implementation Study.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareTrial
- Narrative Review of Two-Drug Regimens in Modern HIV Care: Driving Innovation, Flexibility, and Quality of Life.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Review
- Satisfaction and Treatment Burden Among Early Adopters of Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir-Rilpivirine With and Without Viremia in Three US Ryan White Clinics.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Determinants of long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine discontinuation in real-world HIV care: insights from the relativity cohort.AIDS (London, England) · 2026Article
- Real-World Impact of Insurance Changes on Long-acting Cabotegravir Plus Rilpivirine Delivery.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Effectiveness and Persistence of Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine in Migrant Individuals Living With HIV in Spain: Substudy of the RELATIVITY Cohort.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Observational
- Scalability Metrics and Effort Requirements for a Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Treatment Program.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Discontinuation of Long-acting Injectable Cabotegravir-Rilpivirine in a Large Clinic Cohort.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Safety, Tolerability, and Metabolic Effects of Long-Acting Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine in HIV Care: A Comprehensive Review.Viruses · 2025Review
- Switching to Long-Acting Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine in Turkey: Perspectives from People Living with HIV in a Setting of Increasing HIV Incidence.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine (CAB + RPV LA) administered monthly or every 2 months is recommended by treatment guidelines for maintenance of virologic suppression in people with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). In clinical trials, CAB + RPV LA demonstrated noninferiority versus United States (US) Food and Drug Administration-approved daily oral therapy, and outcomes in real-world settings can supplement these results. We present month 12 results of BEYOND. Methods: BEYOND is an ongoing, 2-year, multicenter, prospective, observational real-world study of adults initiating CAB + RPV LA in the US. Key outcomes included reasons for initiating, virologic outcomes, adherence, and patient-reported outcomes related to treatment satisfaction and treatment challenges at baseline and month 12. Results: In total, 308 participants (median age, 45 years; 83% identified as male; 39% identified as Black) initiated CAB + RPV LA most commonly because of treatment fatigue, adherence anxiety with daily oral therapy, and/or convenience. Of participants with baseline viral load data, 97% (194/200) had a viral load <50 copies/mL for their most recent test reported at month 12. Mean treatment satisfaction scores increased significantly from baseline to month 12 and 97% (223/229) of participants preferred LA versus oral treatment at month 12. Proportions of participants reporting "always" or "often" experiencing challenges related to HIV-1 treatment (fear of disclosure, adherence anxiety, reminder of HIV-1 status, and feeling stigmatized) decreased from baseline to month 12. Conclusions: Month 12 results from the real-world BEYOND study support the effectiveness of CAB + RPV LA for maintenance of virologic suppression and as a preferred treatment option for people with HIV-1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.