ArticlePaediatric and perinatal epidemiology2025
Maternal Age Differences in Interpregnancy Interval and Preterm Birth Associations Accounting for Multiple Epidemiologic Biases.
Article in Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople who recently gave birth are strongly advised to wait 6 months before attempting pregnancy. Interpregnancy intervals (IPI) of ≥ 18 months are considered optimal. Current guidance is not tailored based on maternal characteristics (e.g., age).
objectivesWe evaluated whether maternal age modifies IPI-preterm birth (PTB) associations.
methodsFrom a US retrospective cohort of multiparae (1997-2011), we categorised IPI: < 6, 6-11, 12-17, 18-23 (reference), 24-59 or ≥ 60 months. PTB occurred before 37 0/7 weeks' gestation. We estimated risk ratios (RR) between IPI and PTB using modified Poisson regression, adjusted for potential confounders and stratified by age at prior delivery: < 25 (n = 2484), 25-29 (n = 1626) or ≥ 30 (n = 1209) years. We conducted quantitative bias analysis to adjust for volunteer bias and dependent misclassification between IPI and gestational length (since both are calculated using the estimated start of pregnancy). We computed E-values when RR lower bounds of the 95% simulation intervals were > 1.00.
resultsEstimates were imprecise due to small numbers. However, in terms of general patterns, PTB risk was highest with < 6 months IPI in all age groups (covariate-adjusted RR point estimates ≥ 1.30). The strongest associations were observed among 25-29 years. For ≥ 30 years, PTB risk was lowest with 6-17 months IPI. After multiple bias adjustments, estimates tended to move downward, but similar patterns remained. For 25-29 years, the lower bound of the 95% simulation interval for < 6 versus 18-23 months IPI was > 1.00, with an E-value of 3.82, suggesting unmeasured confounding would need to be very strong to explain the association.
conclusionsEstimates were imprecise. However, our study adds to growing evidence that IPI associations may be weaker among older individuals. Older individuals with shorter IPI may have lower PTB risk than those with currently recommended IPI, but more research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.