Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40302565›Full record

ArticleAcute and critical care2025

Classification of postoperative fever patients in the intensive care unit following intra-abdominal surgery: a machine learning-based cluster analysis using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database, developed in the United States.

Sang Mok Lee, Hongjin Shim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acute and critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sang Mok LeeDepartment of Acute Care Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Hongjin ShimDepartment of Acute Care Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative fever is common. However, it can sometimes indicate severe complications such as sepsis or pneumonia. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients who have undergone abdominal surgery have a higher risk of postoperative fever due the physical severity of this type of surgery. Nevertheless, determining when more aggressive or invasive management of fever is necessary remains a challenge.

methodsWe analyzed the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV and MIMIC-IV-Note databases, which are open critical care big databases from a single institute in the United States. From this, we selected ICU patients who developed fever after intra-abdominal surgery and classified these patients into two groups using cluster analysis based on diverse variables from the MIMIC-IV databases. Following this cluster analysis, we assessed differences among the identified groups.

resultsOf 2,858 ICU stays after intra-abdominal surgery, 331 postoperative fever cases were identified. These patients were clustered into two groups. Group A included older patients with a higher mortality rate, while group B consisted of younger patients with a lower mortality rate.

conclusionsPostoperative ICU patients with a fever could be classified into two distinct groups, a high-risk group and low-risk group. The high-risk patient group was characterized by older age, higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and more unstable hemodynamic status, indicating the need for aggressive management. Clustering postoperative fever patients by clinical variables can support medical decision-making and targeted treatment to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

cluster analysiscritical carefeverpostoperative caresurgery

Identifiers

PMID40302565
PMCPMC12151741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.