ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025
The sticky truth: how spider predation success depends on their prey's body surface.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spiders are prominent predators for insects, with which they have a close co-evolutionary history. Manifold capture techniques have evolved, with spider webs being one of most well-known traps in the world. Many webs include specialised threads, bearing either glue or cribellate nanofibres as adhesive to capture prey. Some webs, such as the sheet webs of Tarantulae, have no such intricate threads. The adhesion of gluey threads has been extensively studied already, but often on artificial surfaces. However, recent studies discovered that adhesion of cribellate nanofibres increases massively after contact with insect cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs). This raises the question whether insect CHCs generally influence prey capture. We compared the adhesion of cribellate, ecribellate gluey and ecribellate non-specialised threads to either uncoated or CHC-coated foil, or native prey body surfaces. We found an influence of CHCs on all silken threads, but with different outcomes. CHC presence, its composition as well as the surface structure can impact the final adhesion force positively or negatively, depending on the thread type. In extreme cases, the adhesion was reduced to nearly zero (e.g. for gluey capture threads in contact with real prey). Thus, prey influence on adhesion is not limited to cribellate capture threads, but is a universal influence on adhesion of spider silken capture threads. Future studies should consider both insect surface chemistry and surface structure when assessing the effectiveness of capture thread types in an ecological and evolutionary context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.