Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40302462›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2025

Superwide Left Atrial Circumferential Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Yue Cao, Wei Du, Yalan Fei, Hao Yang, Meng Wang, Qingshan Dong, Xianjin Li, Shijie Li, Bing Han

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Wide-Antral pulmonary vein isolation in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation with a Single-Shot technique: rationale and design of the WIDER-PVI trial.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yue CaoXuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2989-2044
Wei DuXuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2903-9203
Yalan FeiXuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Hao YangXuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Meng WangXuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Qingshan DongXuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Xianjin LiXuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8761-896X
Shijie LiXuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Bing HanXuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3523-0573

Funding

This study received the support of the BiosenseWebster Inc (Investigator initiated study grant number: IIS-498); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 82370329); the Xuzhou Science and Technology Project(grant number: KC21155); the Xuzhou Medical leading Talents Project (grant number: XWRCHT20210032); the Project of Xuzhou Health Committee (grant number: Xuzhou Health Science and Education [2017] No.22).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt remains to be answered whether further enlargement of the isolation area in the left atrium (LA) could produce better effectiveness than pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF).

aimsTo assess the effectiveness of superwide left atrial circumferential ablation (SWLACA) for treatment of persistent AF (PeAF) through a randomized controlled study.

methodsA total of 248 patients (male 63.7%, median age 65 years) with PeAF were randomly divided into the SWLACA group and PVAI group. The circumferential lines were located 2-3 cm from the PV ostia in the SWLACA group and approximately 1 cm in the PVAI group, respectively. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after a single procedure.

resultsConduction block between LA and pulmonary veins (PVs) were achieved in all patients. The isolation areas were obviously larger in the SWLACA group (p < 0.001). Compared with the PVAI group, the SWLACA group was associated with a longer procedure duration (p = 0.013) and fluoroscopic time (p = 0.038). During the 12-month follow-up, the overall recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia after a single procedure was not significantly different between the two groups (21.0% vs 26.6%; p = 0.297). However, the SWLACA group had significantly fewer AF recurrences (12.9% vs. 25.0%; p = 0.015), and more atrial tachycardia recurrences (8.1% vs. 1.6%; p = 0.018). After multiple procedures, the SWLACA group had a significantly higher total arrhythmia recurrence-free rate (p = 0.030).

conclusionsCompared with PVAI, although SWLACA did not significantly decrease the overall arrhythmia recurrence rate for PeAF, it was associated with a notable reduction in the recurrence of AF.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationHeart AtriaPulmonary VeinsAction PotentialsAgedFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment Outcomearrhythmia recurrencepersistent atrial fibrillationpulmonary vein antrum isolationrandomized controlled studysuperwide left atrial circumferential ablation

Identifiers

PMID40302462
PMCPMC12246515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.