ArticleALTEX2025
Assessment of developmental neurotoxicology-associated alterations in neuronal architecture and function using Caenorhabditis elegans.
Article in ALTEX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence from three taxonomically distinct species for a non-AhR mechanism of developmental neurotoxicity of an environmentally derived mixture of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- High-Throughput Toxicity Screening withEnvironmental science & technology · 2026Review
- Lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide particles cause developmental neurotoxicity inEnvironmental science. Advances · 2025Article
- Inhibition of Mitochondrial Complex III Causes Dopaminergic Neurodegeneration by Redox Stress inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Few of the many chemicals that regulatory agencies are charged with assessing for risk have been carefully tested for developmental neurotoxicity (DNT). To speed up assessment, and to reduce the use of vertebrate animals, great effort is being devoted to alternative laboratory models for DNT. A major DNT mechanism is altered neuronal architecture resulting from chemical exposure during neurodevelopment. Caenorhabditis elegans is a nematode that has been extensively studied by neurobiologists and developmental biologists, and to a lesser extent by neurotoxicologists. The development of the nervous system in C. elegans is easily visualized, entirely invariant, and fully mapped. We hypothesized that C. elegans could be a powerful in vivo model to test chemicals for their potential to alter neuronal architecture during development. We developed a novel C. elegans DNT testing paradigm that includes developmental exposure, examines major neurotransmitter neuronal types for architectural alterations, and tests neuron-specific behaviors. We characterized the effects of exposures to the developmental neurotoxicants lead, cadmium, and benzo(a)pyrene on neuronal architecture and specification. We identified no cases in which the apparent neurotransmitter type of the neurons we examined changed, but many in which neuronal morphology was altered. We found that neuron-specific behaviors were altered during C. elegans mid-adulthood for populations with measured morphological neurodegeneration in earlier stages. The functional changes were consistent with the morphological changes in terms of the type of neuron affected. Finally, we identified changes consistent with those reported in the mammalian DNT literature, strengthening the case for C. elegans as a DNT model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.