ArticleElectrophoresis2025
Assessment of Electrophoretic Mobility Determination in Nanoparticle Analysis: Two Parallel Techniques Converging in a Distinctive Parameter.
Article in Electrophoresis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A critical comparison of the main parameters playing a role in measurement of electrophoretic mobility of plastic nanoparticles (NPs) by CE and laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) techniques in NP suspensions is herein presented, accompanied by a discussion about potential impact on different mobility values observed. Capillary material and dynamic or permanent coating of the inner capillary wall, capillary dimensions, EOF variability, BGE temperature, Joule heating, and presence of species potentially interacting with analyzed NPs are underlined as possible causes of the different performance of the above two techniques. It is of importance to get an insight into the reasons behind experimental conditions and operating features to opt for one technique or the other based on research interests. In the end, it is intended to present a knowledge expansion about two parallel paths that converge in a distinctive parameter of an enormous relevance in CE, effective electrophoretic mobility, not achievable by other techniques, and discuss practical considerations in experimental design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.