Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40302359›Full record

ArticleCancer science2025

A Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Cine-Based Deep Learning Model for Predicting the Response of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined With Systemic Therapies.

Xu Han, Chuan Peng, Si-Min Ruan, Lingling Li, Minke He, Ming Shi, Bin Huang, Yudi Luo, Jingming Liu, Huiying Wen and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02973685 (The Efficacy and Safety of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Compared With Transarterial Chemoembolization as Initial Treatment in Patients With Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staged BCLC A/B.), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02973685 phase3completednot on this map

The Efficacy and Safety of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Compared With Transarterial Chemoembolization as Initial Treatment in Patients With Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staged BCLC A/B.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2016 to 2020Enrolled315ConditionsHepatoCellular CarcinomaArmsHepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, Transarterial chemoembolization, Folfox Protocol, TACE Drug Protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Xu HanState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Chuan PengState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Si-Min RuanDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Ultrasomics Artificial Intelligence X-Lab, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Lingling LiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Minke HeState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Ming ShiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Bin HuangNational-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yudi LuoNational-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Jingming LiuNational-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Huiying WenNational-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Ultrasomics Artificial Intelligence X-Lab, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9485-583X
Jianhua ZhouState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Minhua LuNational-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xin ChenNational-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Ruhai ZouState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Zhong LiuNational-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9650-6097

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2023A1515110202Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2025A1515011934Medicine-Engineering Interdisplinary Funding of Shenzhen UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China 61901282National Natural Science Foundation of China 62471315National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171957National Natural Science Foundation of China 82272014National Natural Science Foundation of China 82327804Science & Technology Projects in Guangzhou 202102080249Shenzhen Basic Science Research (Key Program) JCYJ20220818095612027Shenzhen Basic Science Research (Key Program) JCYJ20241202124228035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, a hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC)-associated combination therapeutic regimen, comprising HAIC and systemic therapies (molecular targeted therapy plus immunotherapy), referred to as HAIC combination therapy, has demonstrated promising anticancer effects. Identifying individuals who may potentially benefit from HAIC combination therapy could contribute to improved treatment decision-making for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This dual-center study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data with advanced HCC patients who underwent HAIC combination therapy and pretreatment contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) evaluations from March 2019 to March 2023. Two deep learning models, AE-3DNet and 3DNet, along with a time-intensity curve-based model, were developed for predicting therapeutic responses from pretreatment CEUS cine images. Diagnostic metrics, including the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), were calculated to compare the performance of the models. Survival analysis was used to assess the relationship between predicted responses and prognostic outcomes. The model of AE-3DNet was constructed on the top of 3DNet, with innovative incorporation of spatiotemporal attention modules to enhance the capacity for dynamic feature extraction. 326 patients were included, 243 of whom formed the internal validation cohort, which was utilized for model development and fivefold cross-validation, while the rest formed the external validation cohort. Objective response (OR) or non-objective response (non-OR) were observed in 63% (206/326) and 37% (120/326) of the participants, respectively. Among the three efficacy prediction models assessed, AE-3DNet performed superiorly with AUC values of 0.84 and 0.85 in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. AE-3DNet's predicted response survival curves closely resembled actual clinical outcomes. The deep learning model of AE-3DNet developed based on pretreatment CEUS cine performed satisfactorily in predicting the responses of advanced HCC to HAIC combination therapy, which may serve as a promising tool for guiding combined therapy and individualized treatment strategies. Trial Registration: NCT02973685.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, HepatocellularDeep LearningLiver NeoplasmsAdultAgedContrast MediaFemaleHumansInfusions, Intra-ArterialMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTreatment OutcomeContrast Mediacombination therapycontrast‐enhanced ultrasounddeep learninghepatic arterial infusion chemotherapyhepatocellular carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID40302359
PMCPMC12210046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.