ReviewInteractive journal of medical research2025
Ethical Challenges and Opportunities of AI in End-of-Life Palliative Care: Integrative Review.
Review in Interactive journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Technologies, Applicability, and Trade-Offs of AI in Palliative Care for Older Adults: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Ethical considerations of AI integration in palliative care: a qualitative study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Care of Terminally Ill Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Conscience, Care, and Code: Moral Theology, AI, and Ethical Decision-Making at the Thresholds of Life.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- A primer on artificial intelligence for palliative care educators.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Review
- Improving sepsis care with Artificial Intelligence. What would Illich say?Critical care science · 2026Article
- Exploring Perspectives of Health Care Professionals on AI in Palliative Care: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Exercise Prescription in Palliative Care: Perceptions and Ethical Issues.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into palliative medicine, offering opportunities to improve quality, efficiency, and patient-centeredness in end-of-life care. However, its use raises complex ethical issues, including privacy, equity, dehumanization, and decision-making dilemmas.
objectiveWe aim to critically analyze the main ethical implications of AI in end-of-life palliative care and examine the benefits and risks. We propose strategies for ethical and responsible implementation.
methodsWe conducted an integrative review of studies published from 2020 to 2025 in English, Portuguese, and Spanish, identified through systematic searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria were studies addressing AI in palliative medicine focusing on ethical implications or patient experience. Two reviewers independently performed study selection and data extraction, resolving discrepancies by consensus. The quality of the papers was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and the Hawker et al tool.
resultsSix key themes emerged: (1) practical applications of AI, (2) communication and AI tools, (3) patient experience and humanization, (4) ethical implications, (5) quality of life perspectives, and (6) challenges and limitations. While AI shows promise for improving efficiency and personalization, consolidated real-world examples of efficiency and equity remain scarce. Key risks include algorithmic bias, cultural insensitivity, and the potential for reduced patient autonomy.
conclusionsAI can transform palliative care, but implementation must be patient-centered and ethically grounded. Robust policies are needed to ensure equity, privacy, and humanization. Future research should address data diversity, social determinants, and culturally sensitive approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.