Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40302208›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2025

Effects of the Number of Neoadjuvant Cycles and Addition of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on the Prognosis of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated With Radical Cystectomy.

Shingo Hatakeyama, Rikiya Taoka, Jun Miki, Ryoichi Saito, Wataru Fukuokaya, Yoshiyuki Matsui, Takashi Kawahara, Ayumu Matsuda, Taketo Kawai, Minoru Kato and 31 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors.

Shingo HatakeyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0026-4079
Rikiya TaokaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan.
Jun MikiDepartment of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Ryoichi SaitoDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Wataru FukuokayaDepartment of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Yoshiyuki MatsuiDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi KawaharaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Ayumu MatsudaDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Taketo KawaiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Minoru KatoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
Tomokazu SazukaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Takeshi SanoDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5854-6258
Fumihiko UrabeDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2599-8183
Soki KashimaDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Hirohito NaitoDepartment of Urology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Yoji MurakamiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Life Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Makito MiyakeDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Kei DaizumotoDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Yuto MatsushitaDepartment of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Takuji HayashiDepartment of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Junichi InokuchiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yusuke SuginoDepartment of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan.
Ken-Ichiro ShigaDepartment of Urology, Harasanshin General Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Noriya YamaguchiDepartment of Urology, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Tottori, Japan.
Motohiro TaguchiDepartment of Urology, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan.
Keiji YasueDepartment of Urology, Jikei University Katsushika Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashige AbeDepartment of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shotaro NakanishiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.
Katsuyoshi HashineDepartment of Urology, NHO Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan.
Masato FujiiDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
Kiyoaki NishiharaDepartment of Urology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hiroaki MatsumotoDepartment of Urology Graduate School of Medicine Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0568-1258
Shuichi TataranoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Koichiro WadaDepartment of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Matsue, Japan.
Sho SekitoDepartment of Urology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Ryo MaruyamaDepartment of Urology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medicine, Niigata, Japan.
Naotaka NishiyamaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Hiroyuki NishiyamaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Hiroshi KitamuraDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Chikara OhyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan.
Japanese Urological Oncology Group

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K09517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effects of the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) cycles and the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after NAC on overall survival (OS) of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 1687 patients with cT2-4NxM0 MIBC who received radical cystectomy (RC) alone or RC plus perioperative chemotherapy at 36 institutions within the Japanese Urological Oncology Group. We evaluated the effect of the number of NAC cycles (2 vs. ≥ 3 cycles) and the addition of AC on OS.

resultsAmong the 1687 patients analyzed, 946 received a median of three NAC cycles. The pathologic complete response rate did not significantly differ between those who received 2 (22.9%) and ≥ 3 cycles (27.5%, p = 0.112). Moreover, no significant difference in OS was observed between the groups (p = 0.559). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that pathologic high-risk (ypT2-4, pT3-4, or pN+) or cisplatin ineligibility were significantly associated with poor OS but not the number of NAC cycles (p = 0.238). We identified 942 pathologically high-risk patients after RC who were eligible for AC. Notably, no significant OS improvement was observed with the addition of AC as intensive perioperative chemotherapy after NAC. The primary limitation was selection bias from confounding by clinical indication.

conclusionsOur findings showed that three or more NAC cycles and the addition of AC may have limited effects on OS in MIBC patients who received RC.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCystectomyUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective Studiesadjuvant chemotherapybladder cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapyoverall survivalradical cystectomy

Identifiers

PMID40302208
PMCPMC12041134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.