Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40302173›Full record

ArticleClinical obesity2025

The implementation of a Nationally Enhanced Service incentive for weight management: A longitudinal qualitative study of the perceptions and experiences of UK primary care staff on weight management using normalisation process theory.

Jack B Joyce, Anisa Hajizadeh, Rachna Begh, Kate Jolly, Susan A Jebb, Paul Aveyard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical obesity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jack B JoyceNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9499-1471
Anisa HajizadehNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1919-5189
Rachna BeghNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0822-9689
Kate JollyInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6224-2115
Susan A JebbNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9190-2920
Paul AveyardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1802-4217

Funding

NIHR Oxford and Thames Valley Applied Research Collaboration NIHR200173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2021 a Nationally Enhanced Service (NES) incentive for weight management in primary care was rolled out in England. This paid general practices £11.50 for every eligible referral they made to a weight management programme. We explored primary care staff's perceptions, experiences and attitudes toward the NES by conducting 37 semi-structured interviews with General Practitioners (GPs), administrative staff and nurses preceding the introduction of the NES (May to September 2021) and 1 year later following its introduction (September to December 2022). Data were analysed using normalisation process theory. The NES for weight management solidified the position of staff already supportive of referring patients to weight management programmes. For staff less supportive of weight management services, the dissonance between the perceived lack of benefit of services and making referrals to services was reduced with referrals becoming more habitual. Facilitators to implementation included the presence of a coherent national policy; having a 'champion' explain key aspects; and a financial incentive if framed as benefiting the practice at large. Barriers included a perception that primary care has been shouldered with a complex and difficult health crisis; a worry over workload burdens; and inefficient and unclear referral systems. The implementation of the NES was broadly welcomed and accepted by primary care staff. Interviewees expressed concerns around the acceptance of weight management policies in primary care, the provision of training to raise the topic of weight and whether the responsibility of weight management fell with primary care, public health or with the patient.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelPrimary Health CareWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultEnglandFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMotivationQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationUnited Kingdomfinancial incentivenormalisation process theoryobesityprimary careweight management

Identifiers

PMID40302173
PMCPMC12401635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.