Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40302102›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026

Qualitative methods are epidemiologic methods: Revisiting the epidemiologist's toolbox.

Elisabeth A Stelson, Roxanne Dupuis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elisabeth A StelsonWashington University in St. Louis, School of Public Health, St. Louis, MO, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5176-2652
Roxanne DupuisDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3161-6310

Funding

NCI NIH HHS 2T32CA057711-26NHLBI NIH HHS 5T32HL098048-15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Qualitative research methods are frequently described as "compatible" with quantitative epidemiologic methods. Instead of simply "compatible," we argue that qualitative methods are epidemiologic methods. Especially in social epidemiology, which embraces the relationships between psychosocial, historical, contextual, and intersectional factors and health, qualitative research methods have the potential to provide a more complete picture of the distribution of health and disease within a population and contexts contributing to population health. To this end, this paper compares qualitative research and epidemiologic research definitions, outlines epidemiologic uses of qualitative data, and addresses common concerns and misconceptions about qualitative research. We emphasize the shared characteristics and champion the use of shared standards across qualitative and quantitative approaches in epidemiology. This article is part of a Special Collection on Methods in Social Epidemiology.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologyQualitative ResearchEpidemiologic MethodsEpidemiologistsHumansResearch Designcausal inferenceepidemiologymethodologypublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40302102
PMCPMC13016636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.