Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40302068›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025

Assessment of Cancer Rate in Mine Workers Exposed to Crystalline Silica.

Mohammad Nourmohammadi, Somayeh Rahimi Moghadam, Ali Jalalian Moghadam, Saeed Yari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad NourmohammadiOccupational Health Engineering, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Somayeh Rahimi MoghadamWorkplace Health Research Center, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2330-2047
Ali Jalalian MoghadamStudent Research Committee, Occupational Health Engineering, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Saeed YariSchool of Health Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-3713-1827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExposure to Respirable Crystalline silica is considered a significant occupational hazard that can greatly impact the health of workers in mining industries. Consequently, the objective of this study is to evaluate the potential risks associated with exposure to crystalline silica for workers employed in mine.

methodsIn this descriptive-analytical study, evaluate the occupational exposure of 65 mine workers across five distinct occupational groups by NIOSH 7500 method. To assess the probability of mortality resulting from silicosis and lung cancer, utilized the Mannetje and Rice model. Moreover, the study also focused on evaluating the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks associated with occupational exposure to silica by using the method recommended by the US EPA.

resultsThe results of the study indicate that the crusher section, which had a concentration of 0.53 mg/m3, showed the highest level of silica exposure, while the security section, with a concentration of 0.09 mg/m3, exhibited the lowest concentration of Respirable Crystalline silica exposure. The results showed that 85% of the samples exceeded the established occupational exposure limit. The risk of death from lung cancer, as indicated by Rice et al.'s linear model, was estimated to be between 15-139 deaths per 1000 worker exposed to Respirable Crystalline silica. However, according to the Mannetje model, worker with a cumulative exposure range of 4.33-2.84 have a 26.3% risk of developing lung cancer. This cause to approximately 6.3 deaths/1000 P. The carcinogenic risk of 92.1% and the non-carcinogenic risk of 65.5% of the workers were at an unacceptable level.

conclusionConsidering the elevated levels of average exposure within work groups, as well as the increased risk of mortality associated with silicosis and lung cancer, it is imperative to implement comprehensive management and engineering control for the mine workers.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMiningOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureSilicon DioxideSilicosisAdultFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk FactorsSilicon DioxideLung cancermine workersRisk AssessmentSilica exposuresilicosis

Identifiers

PMID40302068
PMCPMC12227957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.