ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025
Assessment of Cancer Rate in Mine Workers Exposed to Crystalline Silica.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveExposure to Respirable Crystalline silica is considered a significant occupational hazard that can greatly impact the health of workers in mining industries. Consequently, the objective of this study is to evaluate the potential risks associated with exposure to crystalline silica for workers employed in mine.
methodsIn this descriptive-analytical study, evaluate the occupational exposure of 65 mine workers across five distinct occupational groups by NIOSH 7500 method. To assess the probability of mortality resulting from silicosis and lung cancer, utilized the Mannetje and Rice model. Moreover, the study also focused on evaluating the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks associated with occupational exposure to silica by using the method recommended by the US EPA.
resultsThe results of the study indicate that the crusher section, which had a concentration of 0.53 mg/m3, showed the highest level of silica exposure, while the security section, with a concentration of 0.09 mg/m3, exhibited the lowest concentration of Respirable Crystalline silica exposure. The results showed that 85% of the samples exceeded the established occupational exposure limit. The risk of death from lung cancer, as indicated by Rice et al.'s linear model, was estimated to be between 15-139 deaths per 1000 worker exposed to Respirable Crystalline silica. However, according to the Mannetje model, worker with a cumulative exposure range of 4.33-2.84 have a 26.3% risk of developing lung cancer. This cause to approximately 6.3 deaths/1000 P. The carcinogenic risk of 92.1% and the non-carcinogenic risk of 65.5% of the workers were at an unacceptable level.
conclusionConsidering the elevated levels of average exposure within work groups, as well as the increased risk of mortality associated with silicosis and lung cancer, it is imperative to implement comprehensive management and engineering control for the mine workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.