SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Percutaneous A1 pulley with corticosteroid injection for trigger finger release: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of percutaneous release versus steroid injection among adults with trigger fingers: a randomized clinical trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Trial
- MCID, SCB, and PASS Thresholds After Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release With or Without Corticosteroid Injection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCorticosteroid injection (CI) is one of the first-line treatments for trigger finger (TF) before escalation to surgical procedures such as percutaneous A1 pulley (PAP) release. This systematic review compares outcomes of concurrent PAP and CI for trigger finger release (TFR).
methodsA systematic search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Study variables included the number of patients, mean age, mean follow-up, affected finger, Quinnell grading, return to activity, pre-and post-operative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and complications.
resultsSeven studies were included, with 685 patients with a mean age of 52.0 years (range of 38.0 to 58.9) and a mean follow-up time of 22 weeks (range 1 week to 52 weeks). Throughout these studies, PAP and CI were performed on 243 thumbs, 115 index fingers, 189 middle fingers, 138 ring fingers, and 10 small fingers. PAP and CI reported satisfaction and pain resolution for 96.2% (five studies) of patients. Additionally, all patients returned to activity, sports, or work (three studies).
conclusionConcurrent PAP and CI positively affect clinical outcomes, PROs, and is a well-tolerated procedure with a low rate of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.