ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
A novel Z-shaped anti-rotation rod for atlantoaxial dislocation reduction: finite element analysis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundC1-C2 pedicle screw-rod fixation (PSR) is widely used for atlantoaxial dislocations. However, its limited reduction capacity in refractory cases necessitates additional release surgeries, increasing operative risks including prolonged surgical time and expanded tissue damage. We developed a novel Z-shaped anti-rotation rod to improve reduction capability, but its biomechanical performance requires evaluation.
methodsA nonlinear atlantoaxial instability three-dimensional (3D) C0-C3 finite element model was constructed using computed tomography images from a 25-year-old healthy male without a history of cervical spine diseases. Based on this model, two C1-C2 fixation configurations were simulated: conventional pedicle screw-rod (PS-CR) and pedicle screw-Z-shaped rod (PS-ZR). Reduction forces were measured and compared. Range of motion (ROM), stress distribution and peak stress values of the implants were recorded and compared under six loading conditions including flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.
resultsBoth configurations achieved a greater than 98% reduction in the C1-C2 segmental ROM, with similar compensatory motions in adjacent segments. The reduction force of PS-ZR showed significant advantages (2-8 mm range), achieving a maximum reduction force of 88.544 N, which is 1.67 to 3.68 times that of PS-CR. The PS-ZR system experiences greater stress compared to the PS-CR system, escalating with Z-rod height. Regarding stress distribution and peak values of rods, the maximum stress on the PS-CR system was mainly concentrated at the connection between the rod and the screw nut while the maximum stress on the PS-ZR system was concentrated at the transition part of the "Z" shape.
conclusionsBoth PS-CR and PS-ZR configurations provide reliable and comparable stability. Compared to the PS-CR configuration, the PS-ZR configuration provides superior reduction force and stability, potentially reducing the need for additional release surgery and surgical time. This novel design has significant clinical implications for improving fixation techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.