ArticleBMC psychology2025
Validation study of the Croatian version of the Three-Item Loneliness Scale and its association to social network indices.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLoneliness is a prevalent and complex phenomenon influenced by various social and demographic factors. The goal of this study was to translate the Three-Item UCLA Loneliness Scale into Croatian and test its validity and reliability in practice. An additional aim was to explore the relationship between social connectedness and loneliness within the Croatian population, with respect to age and gender.
methodThe Three-Item Loneliness Scale was translated into Croatian and validated according to widely accepted guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation and translation of the questionnaire into different languages. Subsequently, loneliness and social connectedness were examined in 309 Croatian participants using an anonymous online survey.
resultsThe results indicated a significant association between social connectedness and loneliness. In particular, those with fewer individuals in their social network were associated with higher loneliness. Notably, age had a significant negative association with loneliness, indicating increased loneliness among younger individuals. Meanwhile older individuals with fewer active network domains experienced heightened loneliness compared to other age groups. No effect of gender was observed.
conclusionOur findings highlight the importance of social connectedness in relation to loneliness, particularly among younger and older age individuals. This study, through its validation of the instrument for measuring loneliness, offers important insights into the unique Croatian context, emphasizing how cultural and social factors may influence the experience of loneliness and social connectedness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.