ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025
Stakeholder perspectives on hearing conservation programmes in the South African mining sector: A qualitative study.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hearing Protection Among Workers Exposed to Occupational Noise in the South African Aluminium Industry.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Africa: Gaps, Barriers, and Strategies for Effective Prevention.Noise & healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStakeholders play a crucial role in the success of complex interventions, such as hearing conservation programmes (HCPs), where their active participation directly impacts outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the views of various stakeholders, involved in occupational noise management, in the mining sector in South Africa.
methodsA cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted, recruiting 16 participants through purposive and snowball sampling techniques. Participants represented diverse roles, including Mine Health and Safety officials, audiologists, ventilation and occupational health engineers and an occupational hygiene assistant. In-depth interviews were conducted to gather data, which were later analysed using inductive thematic analysis to identify emerging themes.
resultsThe in-depth interviews revealed six prominent themes that shed light on both the facilitators and barriers to achieving desired milestones in the implementation of HCPs. These themes were crisis management; some are more equal than others; we have tried, but then reality intervenes; cost of an individual's hearing; knowledge is power; and show and tell.
conclusionAchieving milestones requires a comprehensive and systematic approach, fostering collaborative engagement among all stakeholders in the mining industry. By viewing and treating HCPs as complex interventions, occupational healthcare can be improved for individuals exposed to excessive noise in the workplace. The study highlights the need for careful consideration of stakeholder perspectives to ensure the feasibility and effectiveness of interventions aimed at eliminating excessive noise in the mining industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.