ArticleBMC health services research2025
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards aphasia among healthcare workers in Anhui, China: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe information on knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to aphasia among Chinese healthcare workers is scarce. This study aimed to assess the KAP related to aphasia among Chinese healthcare workers, and to identify associated sociodemographic factors.
methodsAn online cross-sectional survey was distributed to tertiary hospitals in Anhui Province, China. Data were collected from April to July 2023 from a total of 119 full-time healthcare workers-comprising doctors, nurses, and therapists-in neurology, rehabilitation, and other aphasia-related departments. KAP scores were the primary metrics, with frequencies and proportions calculated. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests (P <.05) were employed to examine associations between KAP scores and sociodemographic variables.
resultsParticipants generally displayed adequate knowledge (mean score: 6.94 ± 0.76), positive attitudes (56.05 ± 6.82), and acceptable practices (13.79 ± 4.60) towards aphasia. Notable gaps were identified in specialized training, personalized treatment strategies, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Sociodemographic factors, such as education, gender, and occupation, were found to correlate with attitudes and practices but not with knowledge. Specifically, males, individuals in rehabilitation departments, and those with doctoral degrees had better KAP scores.
conclusionsThis inaugural KAP survey on aphasia in China illuminates both the strengths and weaknesses in the current state of aphasia care. Future interventions should focus on targeted strategies that take into account both sociodemographic factors and the gaps identified to optimize aphasia management in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.