ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025
Enhancing cancer-supportive care through virtual reality: a policy brief.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- AΙ-Driven Interventions for Neurocognitive, Self-Regulation, and Adaptive Skill Development in Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Virtual Reality Technology in Otolaryngology Patient Care Management: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Future Prospects.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Review
- Real-World Utilization and Patient Acceptance of Telemedicine in Otorhinolaryngology: A Single-Center Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Healthcare System Drivers of Prostate Cancer Disparities: Real-World Evidence, Informatics Pathways, and Policy Translation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Real-World Implementation and Evaluation of AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support in Emergency Medicine: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Digital Pathology Archives as Long-Term Clinical Memory: A Self-Sovereign Identity-Based Governance Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Experiences and Perspectives of People with Stroke, Carers, and Physiotherapists Toward Telerehabilitation Implementation Following Stroke in Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A scoping review of virtual reality technology utilization in patients with colorectal cancer.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- A clinical decision support system for predicting drug-related adverse effects in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease: Development and retrospective evaluation.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Building an integrated cardiogeriatric heart failure pathway for very old adults: a four-year community case study from Hôpital La Porte Verte.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators in preventing and managing parastomal hernias: a qualitative study from the perspective of enterostomal therapist.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of virtual reality-based exercise rehabilitation for enhancing functional outcomes and quality of life in adult cancer survivors: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Review
- Virtual Reality and Digital Interventions in Cancer Pain Relief: A New Frontier in Supportive Oncology Care.Journal of mid-life healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVirtual reality (VR) technology has been useful in enhancing cancer-supportive care by alleviating pain, anxiety and emotional distress. However, its integration into oncology faces multiple barriers, including limited funding, insufficient clinician training, accessibility challenges, absence of standard guidelines and reimbursement policies. This policy brief highlighted policy options needed for VR technology interventions in cancer-supportive care.
methodsThis policy brief was developed upon a previous systematic review that examined the role of VR in cancer-supportive care. To translate these findings into actionable recommendations, we conducted a secondary analysis of policy-related opportunities and challenges. The extracted evidence was synthesized to propose strategic policy options that facilitate VR adoption in oncology.
resultsA total of five key policy options were identified: (1) increasing funding for VR research and development, (2) training programs for healthcare professionals, (3) expanding patient access through financial support mechanisms, (4) establishing standard clinical guidelines and (5) developing reimbursement policies. These recommendations aim to bridge the gap between technological advancements and their practical implementation in cancer care.
conclusionsIntegrating VR into cancer-supportive care requires a coordinated effort among policymakers, healthcare institutions and technology developers. By implementing these evidence-based policy strategies, stakeholders can enhance patient access, improve clinical outcomes and ensure sustainable adoption of VR in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.