ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in real-world practice: an analysis of the clinical outcomes and long-term survival, and the feasibility of using major pathological response as a surrogate endpoint.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy for the treatment of giant pelvic osteosarcoma: A case report and literature review.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Association of pathological response with long-term survival after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and individual-patient-data meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Comparison of survival outcomes of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy versus chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.JTCVS open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is expected to become the standard treatment mode for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study aims to analyze the clinical outcomes and long-term survival of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for locally advanced ESCC, and explore the feasibility of using major pathological response (MPR) as a surrogate endpoint.
methodsThis real-world retrospective study consecutively included eligible patients with stage II-IVA locally advanced ESCC who received neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and surgery between 2019 and 2022 at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
resultsThis study collected a total of 166 patients, and ultimately included 126 patients after screening. The objective response rate (ORR) was 69.8% (88/126). The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) was 13.5% (17/126). MPR was observed in 49 (38.9%) patients, and 24 (19.0%) patients achieved a complete pathological response (pCR). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 31.7 months and the 3-year PFS rate was 56.3%. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached and the 3-year OS rate was 70.6%. The median PFS of the non-MPR group was 25.0 months, with the MPR group not achieved (hazard ratio [HR], 2.503; 95% CI 1.359-4.610; P = 0.0022). The median OS in the non-MPR group was 31.7 months and not reached in the MPR group (HR, 3.607; 95% CI 1.576-8.254; P = 0.0012). MPR is an independent prognostic factor affecting OS (HR, 2.522; 95% CI 1.018-6.401; P = 0.046).
conclusionsNeoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is safe and effective for locally advanced ESCC, and can result in certain survival benefits. MPR can serve as a surrogate endpoint for predicting long-term OS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.