Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40301906›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2025

Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting no. 253 lymph node metastasis in left-sided colorectal cancer using clinical and CT-based radiomic features.

Hongwei Zhang, Kexin Wang, Shurong Liu, Guowei Chen, Yong Jiang, Yingchao Wu, Xiaocong Pang, Xiaoying Wang, Junling Zhang, Xin Wang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hongwei Zhang *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Kexin Wang *School of Basic Medical Sciences, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, Youanmenwai Street, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, China.
Shurong Liu *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Guowei ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Yong JiangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Yingchao WuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xiaocong PangDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xiaoying WangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China. wangxiaoying@bjmu.edu.cn.
Junling ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China. junlingzhang@pku.org.cn.
Xin WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China. wangxin_guo@126.com.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation JQ24059Multidisciplinary Cooperative Clinical Research Project of Peking University First Hospital 2022CR13National Natural Science Foundation of China 82274015National Natural Science Foundation of China 82372860Scientific Research Seed Fund of Peking University First Hospital 2018SF090Youth Clinical Research Project of Peking University First Hospital 2021CR03Youth Cultivated Research Fund of Peking University Health Center BMU2020PYB026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe appropriate ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in left-sided colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery is debated, with metastasis in No. 253 lymph node (No. 253 LN) being a key determining factor. This study aimed to develop a machine learning model for predicting metastasis in No. 253 LN.

methodsWe retrospectively collected clinical data from 2,118 patients with left-sided CRC and contrast-enhanced CT images from 310 of these patients. From this data, a test set, a training set, and a temporal validation set were constructed. Logistic regression models were used to develop a clinical model, a CT model, and a radiomics model, which were then integrated into a combined model using logical rules. Finally, these models were evaluated using metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), precision-recall (PR) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

resultsA clinical model, a CT model, and a radiomics model were constructed using univariate logistic regression. A combined model was developed by integrating the clinical, CT, and radiomics models, with positivity defined as all three models being positive at a 90% sensitivity threshold. The clinical model included six predictive factors: tumor site, endoscopic obstruction, CEA levels, growth type, differentiation grade, and pathological classification. The CT model utilized largest lymph node average CT value, short-axis diameter and long-axis diameter. The radiomics model incorporated maximum gray level intensity within the region of interest, large area high gray level emphasis, small area high gray level emphasis and surface area to volume ratio. In the test set, the AUCs for the clinical, CT, radiomics, and combined models were 0.694, 0.663, 0.72, and 0.663, respectively, while in the temporal validation set, they were 0.743, 0.629, 0.716, and 0.8. Specifically, the combined model demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.8 and a specificity of 0.8 in the temporal validation set. By comparing the PR and DCA curves, the combined model demonstrated better performance. Additionally, the combined model showed moderate improvements in INR and IDI compared to other models.

conclusionA clinical and CT-based radiomics model shows promise in predicting No. 253 LN metastasis in left-sided CRC and provides insights for optimizing IMA ligation strategies.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMachine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesColorectal cancerLymph node metastasisMachine learningPrediction modelRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID40301906
PMCPMC12039209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.