Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40301897›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal for equity in health2025

Capacity-building strategies that support correctional and justice health professionals to provide best-evidenced based healthcare for people in prison: a systematic review.

Monique Hooper, Claudia Virdun, Jane L Phillips

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Monique HooperSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Queensland University of Technology, QLD, Brisbane, Australia. Monique.hooper@qut.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7235-5981
Claudia VirdunPalliative & End of Life Care, and Member, Flinders Research Centre for Palliative Care, Death, and Dying, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3945-0749
Jane L PhillipsSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Queensland University of Technology, QLD, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3691-8230

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe United Nations (UN) 2015 'Mandela Rules' stipulates that people in prison will have access to equivalent healthcare to other community members. This expectation has challenged prisons in high-income countries to strengthen healthcare delivery to better meet the needs of the growing number of incarcerated First Nations and older, frailer people, many with complex healthcare needs. Yet little is known about correctional and justice health professionals' ('prison workforces') capacity to identify and support people in prisons with complex healthcare needs.

aimTo identify the post-Mandela Rules strategies that have increased the prison workforce's capacity to provide evidence-based healthcare.

methodsA systematic review. Three health and Criminal Justice databases were searched (2015-June 2024) to identify empirical data regarding the 'individual', 'organizational' and 'community' capacity-building strategies employed to improve the prison workforce's healthcare capabilities. Kirkpatrick's Model was used to assess the evaluation level, while Popay's narrative synthesis was applied to the extracted data. Findings are reported according to the PRISMA Statement.

resultsOf the 20 included articles, the highest level of evidence (level III) was generated by a mixed methods study, with most (n = 17) generating low-level (Level IV) evidence. Ten studies evaluated mental health behavioral capacity-building strategies, with limited attention given to other chronic illnesses, ageing, palliative care, or cultural needs. More complex capacity-building strategies that included individual, organizational, and community-level elements generated the best outcomes. The best individual-level capacity-building outcomes were more frequent (> 5 occasions) interactive health-related education delivered in partnership with external experts. However, the commonly employed capacity-building strategies were short didactic education sessions, which were less effective.

conclusionIf prisons are to meet the UN Mandela Rules' aspirations, more impactful individual, organizational and community-level capacity-building strategies are urgently required. Transitioning to co-designed, interactive, culturally sensitive, evidence-based approaches is crucial if the prison workforce is to better recognize and effectively respond to the needs of more culturally diverse and older, sicker populations with complex healthcare needs.

trial registrationProspero CRD42023410564.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingHealth PersonnelPrisonersPrisonsDelivery of Health CareHealth Services AccessibilityHumansAgingCultural competencyHealth equityHealth resourcesHealth workforcePrisons

Identifiers

PMID40301897
PMCPMC12039081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.