ArticleBMC oral health2025
Treatment of severe anterior open bite by using tongue crib and teeth extraction: a case report.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: A comparative evaluation of anterior open bite orthodontic treatment outcomes and stability of results in monozygotic twins.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnterior open bite is a kind of malocclusion that can affect the oral function, aesthetics and even mental health of adolescents. Breaking harmful habits plays an important role in the orthodontic treatment of patients during the growth and development period. CASE PRESENTATION: This case focuses on a 13-year-old adolescent male with anterior open bite of 6 mm, Class II malocclusion, and finger sucking, tongue thrusting habits, and abnormal swallowing pattern. Based on the etiology and the patient's condition, a treatment plan involving extraction of second premolars and use of an adhesive tongue crib was implemented. After 35 months of active treatment and 12 months of retention, results showed improved occlusion, normal overbite and overjet, proper molar relationships, and enhanced facial aesthetics. The study highlights addressing etiological factors and using appropriate treatments. A modified Hawley retainer and a retainer with a welded tongue crib at night helped maintain results due to the patient's history and potential for recurrence.
conclusionsFor adolescent patients with anterior open bite, clear diagnosis and elimination of causative factors are key to favorable treatment results. Combining multiple mechanisms can effectively restore and establish a good occlusal relationship. Throughout the treatment, it is also necessary to pay attention to patients' growth and development. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.