Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40301847›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Health-promoting resources and workplace experiences among newly graduated healthcare and social work professionals - a multicentre cross-sectional study.

Ingrid Larsson, Inger Ahlstrand, Margaretha Larsson, Sandra Pennbrant, Aimée Ekman, Jenny Hallgren

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ingrid LarssonSchool of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, PO Box 823, Halmstad, S-301 18, Sweden. ingrid.larsson@hh.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4341-660X
Inger AhlstrandSchool of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3152-8353
Margaretha LarssonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7368-953X
Sandra PennbrantDepartment of Health Sciences, University West, Trollhättan, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2793-9937
Aimée EkmanSchool of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3801-0541
Jenny HallgrenSchool of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1819-0896

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNewly graduated healthcare and social work professionals can experience stress and a perceived lack of competence when transitioning from academia to clinical practice, which can lead to health problems or leaving the profession. Globally, creating healthy workplaces remains a challenge. The aim of this study, which had a salutogenic approach, was to explore health-promoting resources and workplace experiences among newly graduated healthcare and social work professionals.

methodsThis multicenter cross-sectional study included Swedish healthcare and social work professionals in their second year after graduation, recruited from six universities. Data were collected in March 2023 via a self-reported, web-based survey using validated instruments: the salutogenically oriented 13-item Sense of Coherence (SOC) Scale, the Salutogenic Health Indicator Scale (SHIS), and the 32-item Work Experience Measurement Scale (WEMS), along with questions on health, well-being, lifestyle and social factors at work, including three from the General Nordic Questionnaire (QPSNordic). Data were analyzed in SPSS 28 with nonparametric tests and Spearman correlations.

resultsA total of 115 newly graduated healthcare and social work professionals completed the questionnaire. The results indicated that those who expressed they were sure to stay in the profession reported a higher total WEMS score (p < 0.001), as well as higher scores in five out of six dimensions: supportive working conditions (p < 0.001), internal work experience (p < 0.001), autonomy (p < 0.001), time experience (p = 0.006), and management (p = 0.029). Participants who rated their well-being as good scored higher in supportive working conditions (p = 0.025) and the change process (p = 0.008). Those living with children reported higher internal work experience scores (p = 0.019). The results revealed positive and medium-strong to strong correlations between WEMS, SHIS, and SOC total scores. Specifically, there were medium-strong correlations between SHIS and SOC and two dimensions of WEMS: supportive working conditions and time experience, and between SHIS and the change process dimension.

conclusionsThis study highlights the importance of salutogenic resources in supporting newly graduated professionals. Factors such as supportive working conditions, autonomy, and internal work experience were linked to well-being and intention to stay in the profession. Understanding these factors can inform workplace interventions to promote retention and health in early career stages.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHealth PromotionSocial WorkSocial WorkersWorkplaceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedSense of CoherenceSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenHealthHealthcareHealth-promoting resourcesNewly graduatedSocial workWork experience

Identifiers

PMID40301847
PMCPMC12039133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.