ArticleBMC palliative care2025
A joint hospital initiative to strengthen general palliative care in the hospital: an action research study on challenges and facilitators.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Meta-integration of qualitative studies on spiritual experience in palliative care for advanced cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProviding general palliative care in hospital settings challenges hospitals' multifaceted role in both saving lives and managing end-of-life care. The challenges in delivering general palliative care are compounded by organizational and cultural factors, underscoring the importance of establishing coordinated care frameworks for patients in their final stages of life. However, little is known about how to organize the enhancement of general palliative care in the hospital setting. The aim of this study is to examine the barriers and facilitators on the organizational level during the process of strengthening general palliative care within a joint hospital initiative.
methodsThis study is qualitative action research that follows four cyclical phases: 1. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION: Qualitative interviews were performed with 24 departments and hospital management, totaling n = 64 participants. 2-3. Planning and taking action: Workshops were developed and performed in 14 departments. 4. EVALUATION: Qualitative evaluation interviews on the process were performed with 16 departments and hospital management, totaling n = 27.
resultsThe data analysis identified three central themes: 1: Delivering general palliative care - from lack of systematic approach to increased awareness; 2:. Strengthening interdisciplinary communication and collaboration and 3: Paraclinical involvement in palliative care - balancing treatment protocols with patient well-being. The results highlight barriers such as a lack of standardized structures and fragmented care approaches, alongside facilitators like employing dedicated palliative resource persons, increasing awareness of general palliative care, and involvement of paraclinical specialties who face ethical dilemmas balancing treatment protocols with patient well-being.
conclusionThis study highlights the complexity of the process of strengthening a joint initiative in a hospital setting, with identified barriers centered around interdisciplinary collaboration and paraclinical care integration. Enhancing collaboration faces challenges in knowledge dissemination and decision-making discrepancies. Overcoming these barriers is crucial to enhancing general palliative care delivery, emphasizing sustained initiatives in promoting collaboration, improving communication, and integrating healthcare sectors involved in palliative care. Continued education, training, and knowledge-sharing initiatives are essential for the ongoing general palliative care services and alignment with evolving patient needs and healthcare practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.