ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Clinical analysis of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis concurrent with surgery resectable lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study from perspective of ILD physicians.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A narrative review of the early diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurgery resection would improve idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients with early-stage lung cancer (LC). However, most associated studies were published from surgeons. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) physicians involved in perioperative management would be helpful for improving patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis combined with lung cancer (IPF-LC). To enhance the understanding of the clinical characteristics presented by patients with IPF-LC who have undergone surgical resection, and to explore the factors linked to unfavorable prognosis, our ILD physicians conducted this study.
methodsWe retrospectively examined clinical records of IPF-LC patients at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2014 to December 2023.Data related to clinical manifestations and treatment methods were collected. Patients underwent routine follow-up through clinical assessments and telephone consultations. The demographic, clinical, and laboratory features of 12 surviving patients and 8 deceased patients were comparatively analysed.
resultsThere were 30 males and 2 females, aged from 49 years to 82 years. Twenty-eight patients had a history of smoking. Twenty-five patients had at least one comorbidity and emphysema was the most common. IPF was diagnosed before LC in 8 patients but none of them were prescribed with anti-fibrotic medications. Twenty-four patients were simultaneously diagnosed with LC and IPF, and 7 of them were prescribed anti-fibrotic medications. After surgery, 27 patients were pathologically diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and 26 patients were classified as stage I or II lung cancer. During follow-up, 8 patients died, 12 patients lost follow-up and 12 patients survived. Among the 8 deceased patients, 5 patients died from acute exacerbation of IPF, one died from cancer progression and 2 died from surgical complications. The serum Cyfra211 level was higher and the lung cancer stage was more advanced in the non-survival group than in the survival group.
conclusionMost of our IPF-LC patients were elderly males with a history of smoking and had at least one comorbidity. Most of them were diagnosed with IPF and LC simultaneously. However, only one fifth were prescribed with pirfenidone or nintedanib. Acute exacerbation of IPF was the main cause of death. Similar to the LC patients, higher serum Cyfra211 levels and more advanced lung cancer stages were associated with a poor prognosis for our enrolled IPF-LC patients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.